- #Digital performer 8 vs cubase 7 manual
- #Digital performer 8 vs cubase 7 pro
- #Digital performer 8 vs cubase 7 software
- #Digital performer 8 vs cubase 7 free
And of the three formerly mentioned, I feel Digital Performer is the winner of all. Although I have to say that all the whining about Reaper being bad at midi is a bit too much in my opinion it's actually just a small step behind Logic, Cubase or Digital Performer. Sorry guys, but this is where DP truly, truly shines over Reaper in every aspect.
#Digital performer 8 vs cubase 7 pro
DP, on the other hand, feels like a clunky combination between Cubase and Pro Tools, and while it should be very good, nowhere does the program feel that it was truly made for this stuff. Although, I don't think Reaper has to customized that much when dealing with recorded audio, because the default settings pretty much feel optimized for this task, at least to me. I feel Reaper is easily the winner here, for it's ease of routing (anyone complaining about routing in Reaper should try DP for a while, and then come back more on this later) and the power of the almighty macro! That, and again it's customizability.
I'm not a studio, mixing, mastering guy, so this will be a short comparison.
#Digital performer 8 vs cubase 7 manual
It's infamous manual is a 1000 page double-whopper (yes, you read that right), and to learn it's nomenclature seems like an effort to read Latin fluently.īut, despite it's steep learning curve, I feel it's easier to learn DP because it focuses on a singular vision to which all features must abide, whereas Reaper often feels like a collection of great ideas that sometimes work together brilliantly, other times not so much. Luckily, the customization aspect makes for a wonderful payoff in the end. There's almost too many options, and in order to turn it from the default setup to a monster orchestration program truly takes a lot of time, effort and frustration. Reaper is awesome in it's ability to customize nearly anything, but I feel that sometimes that is also it's Achilles Heel. But to actually use Reaper for very intricate orchestration purposes is a difficult exercise in trying, watching videos, reading the manual, trying again, watching videos again, reading the manual again. Now, if all you want to do is record audio and mix it down, sure, Reaper is easy enough. I would like to thank Kenny Goia for his wonderful and in depth tutorials, which really helped me get a grip on the program. Let's face it Reaper isn't exactly the easiest DAW to learn. It has themes, customizable shortcuts, even more dockers than Reaper, and is generally very flexible when it comes to making it exactly the way you could want.īut yes, I feel Reaper has the upper hand here, not only because the customization goes far deeper than anything DP has ever done before, but also because it's insane macro feature, something I wish DP and any other program had. You see, Digital Performer is a close second when compared to other DAWs. One would say Reaper wins this hands down, but that is not as simple as it seems.
#Digital performer 8 vs cubase 7 software
Such is fate when dealing with software as deep and intricate as Reaper. I know that it is especially common to make mistakes about what Reaper can't do whilst it is just a matter of being in the know.
#Digital performer 8 vs cubase 7 free
That said, if I'm wrong about any of the two DAWs, feel free to comment. I'll try and put this in logical categories. I'll try to do this as honestly and unbiased as I can be, for I love none over the other. Why make a comparison, you ask? Because I love both Reaper and DP, and wish to share my vision of what each of the programs could learn from each other. Now, the first thing I wanted to do was to compare Reaper to another DAW I've already used for quite some time, a DAW that belongs with the big guys up there but seems to be somewhat of a secret weapon of sorts, for it rarely comes up in any forum whatsoever I'm talking about the beautiful Digital Performer by MOTU. So, for any questions regarding scoring techniques, VI's, seating and placement, instrumentation and whatnot, I'm here and available. Now, I'm a budding film composer who works with a lot of VI's, and as such, I'll try and do my best to give people advice on this subject, for I think I'm pretty well versed on the subject. Of all the newer DAWs, this is for me the most interesting. I've decided to register because I'm curious as to what Reaper not only is, but what it will become.
I've yet to buy it though, but I've tried the demo and I frankly gotta say that I love it! I've been ghosting the forums for some time now, as I find Reaper to be a fascinating DAW with a wonderful promise. First of all, hello to all on this wonderful forum.
0 kommentar(er)
